Please respect new people - everyone's new at one point!
0 Members, Big Brother and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Light and Fairy aren't interchangeable,they're going have to keep the translation pretty close to the original Japanese - otherwise you may get descriptions that don't fit Pokemon (say if they renamed Fairy as Light, and Clefairy was a Light type or something, doesn't fit as comfortably as Fairy does it.)I'm personally very interested in future developments.
The potential for Fairy is awesome. I'd love to see some Finnish fairytale creatures inspiring Pokemon. A fairytale frog or caterpillar would be really awesome. I wonder if they'll use another Mushroom Pokemon, there is a naturally occurring phenomena called 'Fairy rings' whereby rings of mushrooms grow for unknown reasons and it is said fairies dance inside them.
Yah. Excellent points. John I must say you've been excellent on the research stuff. Good work mate. Personally, I'm excited to see what older Pokemon this would effect, and depending on it's properties plus any new abilities and or moves may make some Pokemon at the back very interesting to use again.
Shroomish comes to mind, it looks it and is in the fairy egg group. But then there's the issue of Breloom, can't see triple types, and losing either of it's other types won't go down too well.
Remind me why we need another type?
And why this Hiro person has to ALWAYS be corrct, even if he has predicted things before?
Fairy TYPE and Fairy EGG GROUP too?Aha, Pokemon X and Y is trying to be as new and different a Pokemon game as possible.
idk don't knock it till it happensWe're not saying he's correct, we're saying that there's a chance this may happen and/or creating grounds for discussion. Don't try to be critical when there's nothing to be critical about.
Okay, fine. But the types we had till now are fine. GF don't need to introduce a new type just for the sake of making these games radically different.