Please respect new people - everyone's new at one point!
0 Members, Big Brother and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'm uncertain as to whether or not this is a good idea, considering how many bad nicknames there are, but if anyone can prove they're educated and capable enough to leave a decent brief critique, I don't see why one person should have all the nicknames dumped onto him.So I was thinking that more people should be added to the team. That way, names would be rated faster, thereby allowing more people to submit their Nicknames and heave them rated, and there would be less work for everyone.The 'new hires' would either send reviews for specific names to the Name Rater, where he could approve/dismiss them and post the rating as his own, or they would just do it themselves.There would have to be certain criteria that would need to be addressed of course:Can they differentiate between a good name and a bad one (obviously)?In the case of a decent name, can they write a good, brief review of it?And in the case of a bad name, can they explain what is wrong with it.And in the case of especially bad names, can they demonstrate the appropriate amount of Name Rater cruelty?These traits would have to be evaluated, but I think that this might be a good idea. Thoughts?
The only reason my insults aren't "name rater cruelty" in my nickname rating thread is because of the forum rules (don't want to break the rules by being nasty!)
Be honest! Who thinks I'd make a good name rater?
The actual name rater insults people quite easily without breaking forum rules. It's all about being witty and sarcastic instead of being flat out nasty.
And this is just asking for someone to start a flame war.
a volunteer came home drunk one night and thought it was hilarious.
Here's something to talk about though: If you exclude yourself, which other member would do well as name rater?
then again my garbage brain may be getting mixed up.