Let's count to 100,000,000 [continued!]

[SirBlaziken]

16456, wow, that ace attorney demo is helping me out in arguments.

[quack98]

OBJECTION!

"Dick used to call poison, fish"
"Poison, fish"

Why the comma? It shouldn't be there.

[lugia95]

16457. Yeah, I'm not getting involved. Even Wright knows not to defend guilty people.

[SirBlaziken]

16458, comma in the wrong place? I thought I came home to escape grammar nazi's, not to find them.

[lugia95]

16459. OBJECTION! The word "comma" should have a capital letter, and it's "Nazis", not "nazi's".

[quack98]

OBJECTION!!! (To Blaze, not my bro)

Nazis were a political party, ergo irrelevant to the case at hand.

[SirBlaziken]

16461

OBJECTION! (To Nate)

There's more than one nazi, therefore the Comma should be there.

DOUBLE OBJECTION! (To Dick)

There's no number, ergo making your evidence invalid.

[Wolstenholme]

16462. OBJECTION! (Oh yeah, I'm getting involved!)

Grammar Nazi is a turn of phrase that refers to the strict discipline of the Nazi party.

[SirBlaziken]

16463, Thank you kindly, Chloe.

[lugia95]

16465. Pretty sure she wasn't trying to help you, Blaze...

[SirBlaziken]

16465, your evidence is invalid, wrong number.

[quack98]

16462. OBJECTION! (Oh yeah, I'm getting involved!)

Grammar Nazi is a turn of phrase that refers to the strict discipline of the Nazi party.

16467. OBJECTION!

The Nazi party for a majority of it's time was not strict, it was only when Adolf took control that it became so, ergo making the term stereotypical of a perfectly good party for a majority of it's time!

16461

OBJECTION! (To Nate)

There's more than one nazi, therefore the Comma should be there.

This genuinely made me laugh... Plurals don't have commas...

[lugia95]

16468. OBJECTION!

That was the right number, it was you who posted the wrong number, Blaze.

[SirBlaziken]

OBJECTION!

"Dick used to call poison, fish"
"Poison, fish"

Why the comma? It shouldn't be there.

16457. Yeah, I'm not getting involved. Even Wright knows not to defend guilty people.

16468, proof's in the pudding.

[quack98]

16469. Proof is in the reply number plus 15001...