Topic: lets count to 100,000,000

[lugia95]

2946. You messed up the number again.

[quack98]

2947. Sorry... I can't count 

[lugia95]

2948. I get the feeling that that's not true...

Wow, that was almost a compliment.

[quack98]

2949. Ok, I can count, I just can't type...

[lugia95]

2950. That makes more sense.

[quack98]

2951. Dammit Nathan, you stole the (very minor) milestone number!

[lugia95]

2952. You realise that unless Chloe comes back (or if you muck up the count again), I'm going to get 3000, given the fact that I'm getting all the even numbers. Just thought I'd point that out.

[quack98]

2953. I just won't post 2999.

[lugia95]

2954. That's how much you care about the milestone numbers?

[quack98]

2956. Someone on page 2 posted 20.5, and people went along with it, making our count one behind. So it is 2956. Meaning I will hit the 3000 

[lugia95]

OBJECTION! *awesome Ace Attorney music starts playing*

There have been many mistakes along the way, and obviously we cannot take all of them into account. However, the first reply gave us number two. Therefore, each numbered post must be one ahead of the reply number. Since your last post was reply number 2954, that therefore means that 2955 was the correct number for that post, making this post's number 2956! Ha!

[quack98]

2956.



You can't prove there isn't a system flaw. 

[lugia95]

2958. You seriously messed it up there.

Oh, and OBJECTION! You cannot prove that there is a system flaw, therefore meaning it would be a whole lot simpler to carry on without your weird changes.

[quack98]

2959.



I have a better objection than you so your argument is void

[lugia95]

2960.

Doesn't matter, you posted the right number, I win.