Advertising is not just giving a link to another site - some sites are well known to the extent that nicknames are just as bad. The usual punishments apply here as they do to giving links.
0 Members, Big Brother and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I don't know if this has been brought up, but why don't we use the Smogon tiers, as they do vigorous playtesting and are considerably cleverer at competitive battling than us? I mean, we can't say that something 'dominates the metagame' unless we have played a large amount of matches with several other people in that metagame who know what they're doing, surely. You can theorymon all you like, but you actually have to playtest to see if something is broken.Also, Smogon's NU tier is just what hasn't reached UU by usages. It's not balanced atm.
So we're editing a good tier list... because we want to be individual? Despite the fact this will most probably worsen it?
Smogon's list is based upon usage, which is why I think OU should be be 80-90% based off theirs. BL is really the only "logic" tier, which is underused Pokemon that are too good/centralising for the UU atmosphere, and Smogon are rather conservative about putting stuff in BL -- there's only five Pokemon and one of them's only there because he incites a weather effect.I'll get arguments like "this is our tier list not smogon's RAH RAH RAH RAGE RAGE RAGE" -- smogon are a hell of a lot more reliable than us, and if we want our information as accurate as possible then it has to be based off theirs.And why is it that I suggested a stickied topic like this about a year or more ago but it only goes into effect now? <_<EDIT: TCoZ kinda cut me off but I don't see post notification, but what he said is more or less what I said in a nutshell.Individuality and accuracy do not go hand in hand sometimes.
Erm, what? I never said anything about Zangoose.